Re: blog entry on RAID limitation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday January 22, rikherrin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Wouldn't connecting a UPS + using a stable kernel
> version remove 90% or so of the "RAID-5 write hole"
> problem?  Are there any other means to know when this
> has occurred?

A UPS would help, as would a well-tested stable kernel.
However sometimes power supplies die, so make sure you have two of
them...

Yes, there are several ways to mitigate the risk.  However they cost
money and the risk is actually already very small in the first place.  
Coming up with a by-design approach that removes the risk completely
is still a good goal, providing the performance costs are reasonable
(i.e. almost zero).

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux