Re: Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>Furthermore, I would prefer not to use LVM nor any middle layer
>between MD and the fs... Is this middle layer *very* usefull when I'm
>sure my partitions layout will not evolve (e.g. only one enormous fs)
>?

Another feature of LVM is moving physical devices (PV). This makes it
easier to grow your enormous fs because it allows you to remove disks.

An example:

Today 1 500GB RAID6 PV #1
A year from now, add another 1TB PV #2, no LVM advantage yet.
A year later, you want to add another 1TB PV #3 but then you want to
remove the first 500GB. With LVM you can copy PV #1 to PV#3 without
affecting the filesystem and then remove PV #1.

I haven't ever done this, just read about it. Also, maybe when md
allows growing raid5/6 this will be handled by md.

HTH

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux