2006/1/5, berk walker <berk@xxxxxxxxx>: [...] > > > > > Ext3 does have a fine record. Might I also suggest an added expense of > 18 1/2% and do RAID6 for better protection against data loss? > b- > Well, I guess so. I just hope I'll be given enough money for it, since it increases the cost per GB. Anyway I guess that it is preferable than a raid5 + 1 spare. By the way, not really a raid-oriented question, but what is the exact robustness of ext3 resizing ? I mean : what happens if the box crashes while resizing an ext3 ? This implies, of course, resizing capabilities for raid6, which is not implement yet. Is it ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
