Supposedly current versions of EVMS and LVM sit overtop of the same "device mapper" kernel component... Given this, I have to wonder if the situation hasn't changed since last evaluated. On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 00:36 -0800, Andargor The Wise wrote: > --- Paul Aviles <paul.aviles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Are SATA drives similar in performance than IDE > > drives? I have tested > > Barracudas 7200.0 (500Gb) and WD too on the same > > type of servers (more than > > 1 unit) and what I am getting is painfully slow in > > terms of read/writes. > > Anyone out there with similar experience or this is > > just my isolated > > results? > > > > Thanks > > > > Paul Aviles > > > > Don't know about IDE, but I did some SATA tests on > RAID-5, if it can give you an indication: > > http://www.andargor.com/raid5.html > > BTW, EVMS will cut your performance about 50% (the > tests were run with straight MD, no EVMS). I don't > know about LVM, but that might add some overhead as > well... > > Andargor > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. > http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
