Re: RAID-6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Followup to:  <1132173592.23464.459.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
By author:    Dan Stromberg <strombrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.raid
>
> 
> My understanding is that RAID 5 -always- stripes parity.  If it didn't,
> I believe it would be RAID 4.
> 
> You may find http://linux.cudeso.be/raid.php of interest.
> 
> I don't think RAID level 6 was in the original RAID paper, so vendors
> may have decided on their own that it should mean what they're
> selling.  :)
> 

RAID-6 wasn't in the original RAID paper, but the term RAID-6 with the
P+Q parity defintion is by far the dominant use of the term, and I
believe it is/was recognized by the RAID Advisory Board, which is as
close as you can get to an official statement.  The RAB seems to have
gotten defunct, with a standard squatter page on their previous web
address.

	-hpa



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux