Re: quick Q re raid reconstruction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Brown wrote:
>>Q1) What is the correct command to bring these three up as
>>    degraded?
> 
> 
>   mdadm --assemble --force /dev/mdX /dev/sd[abc]1
> 
> However this won't work with the superblocks you have. So
> 
>   mdadm --create /dev/mdX -l5 -c256 -n4 missing /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc

I do not see 'missing' the the mdadm manpage, but maybe Debian is too
far behind?

# mdadm --version
mdadm - v1.9.0 - 04 February 2005

Should I use 2.1 (is it safe to upgrade to it)?

I built it anyway and I do not see 'missing' listed in
	mdadm --create --help

Reading the new mdadm.man I can see what .missing' does, good.

I got it up (fsck now running), thanks a lot.

-- 
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
	attach .zip as .dat
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux