Gregory Seidman said the following on 20/10/2005 12:19:
} PV:
} /dev/md1 - 4 x 40GB drives (RAID5 - 120GB total)
} /dev/md2 - 4 x 40GB drives (RAID5 - 120GB total)
You should at least read the following before using RAID5. You can agree or
disagree, but you should take the arguments into account:
http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt
This was just an example configuration. My current 1TB array is RAID5
with 1 hot spare but I'll most likely use RAID6 in production.
} Suppose I then add a new PV:
} /dev/md3 - 4 x 300GB drives (RAID5 - 900GB total)
You use pvcreate and vgextend to do so, incidentally.
Yes, thanks for the detail.
} When this finishes, big_vg will contain /dev/md2 + /dev/md3 (1020GB
} total). /dev/md1 will be unused.
/dev/md1 will still be a part of big_vg, but it won't have any data from
any LVs on it. You will need to use vgreduce to remove /dev/md1 from the
VG:
# vgreduce big_vg /dev/md1
Ah, yes, forgot about that step.
Thanks for the validation of the methodology.
I'm going to give this a try on my test server (using much smaller disks!)
Thanks again,
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
If a man speaks in a forest,
and his wife's not there,
is he still wrong?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
