Christopher Smith wrote:
Robin Bowes wrote:
Hi,
I have a business opportunity which would involve a large amount of
storage, possibly growing to 10TB in the first year, possibly more.
This would be to store media files - probably mainly .flac or .mp3
files.
Here's what I do (bear in mind this is for a home setup, so the data
volumes aren't as large and I'd expand in smaller amounts to you - but
the principle is the same).
I use a combination of Linux's software RAID + LVM for a flexible,
expandable data store. I buy disks in sets of four, with a four-port
disk controller and a 4-drive, cooled chassis of some sort (lately,
the Coolermaster 4-in-3 part).
I RAID5 the drives together and glue multiple sets of 4 drives
together into a single usable chunk using LVM.
Over the last ~5 years, this has allowed me to move from/to the
following disk configurations:
4x40GB -> 4x40GB + 4x120GB -> 4x40GB + 4x120GB + 4x250GB -> 4x120GB +
4x250GB -> 4x250GB + 4x250GB.
In the next couple of months I plan to add another 4x300GB "drive set"
to expand further. I add drives about once a year. I remove drives
either because I run out of physical room in the machine, or to re-use
them in other machines (eg: the 4x120GB drives are now scratch space
on my workstation, the 4x40GB drives went into machines I built for
relatives). The case I have now is capable of holding about 20
drives, so I probably won't be removing any for a while (previous
cases were stretched to hold 8 drives).
Apart from the actual hardware installations and removals, the various
reconfigurations have been quite smoothe and painless, with LVM
allowing easy migration of data to/from RAID devices, division of
space, etc. I've had 3 disk failures, none of which have resulted in
any data loss. The "data store" has been moved across 3 very
different physical machines and 3 different Linux installations
(Redhat 9 -> RHEL3 -> FC4).
I would suggest not trying to resize existing arrays at all, and
simply accept the "space wastage" as a cost of flexibility. Storage
is cheap, and a few dozens or hundreds of GB lost to long-term cost
savings is well worth it IMHO. The space I "lose" but not
reconfiguring my RAID arrays whenever I add more disks is more than
made up for by the money I've saving not buying everything at once, or
the additional space available at the same price point.
I would, however, suggest getting a case with a large amount of
physical space in it so you don't have to remove drives to add bigger
ones.
But, basically, just buy as much space as you need now and then buy
more as required - it's trivially easy to do, and you'll save money in
the long run.
CS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
What case and power supply(s)are you using? What raid cards are you
using also?
Thanks,
Tyler.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 9/30/2005
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
