Re: Good, recent FS comparison?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Al Boldi wrote:
> Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Al Boldi wrote:
> > > ext3 is rock-solid!
> >
> > If only.  Recently I had a system come up after a power cycle with a
> > directory where reading any file in that directory gives an I/O error.
> > The disk is fine, and it's using ext3 in ordered mode, with IDE
> > write-caching disabled to be sure.
> 
> 2.4 or 2.6?
> 
> In 2.4 try a reboot and force an fsck before mounting.

2.4.26, uclinux - it's an embedded device.

Doing an fsck before mounting would be an unacceptable boot-time delay.

Why do you suggest that, specifically for 2.4?  Is there a known
problem with 2.4 and ext3?

Thanks,
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux