Re: MD or MDADM bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday September 2, dstrang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > mdadm 2.0 had a fix for assembling version-1 arrays that would
> > particularly affect raid5.  Try using that instead of -devel-3.
> 
> No luck -- 
> 
> -(root@abyss)-(~)- # mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd 
> /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk /dev/sdl 
> /dev/sdm /dev/sdn /dev/sdo /dev/sdp /dev/sdq /dev/sdr /dev/sds /dev/sdt 
> /dev/sdu /dev/sdv /dev/sdw /dev/sdx /dev/sdy /dev/sdz /dev/sdaa /dev/sdab -f
> mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 26 drives - not enough to start the array.
> 
> Any other suggestions?
> 

Can you run that with '-v' for me?

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux