Hello,
We have recently tested Linux 2.6.12 SW RAID versus HW Raid. For SW Raid
we used Linux 2.6.12 with 8 Seagate SATA NCQ disks no spare on a Dual
Xeon platform. For HW Raid we used a Arc-1120 SATA Raid controller and a
Fibre Channel Raid System (Dual 2 Gb, Infortrend).
READ SW:877 ARC:693 IFT:366
(MB/s @64k BS using disktest with raw device)
Read SW Raid performance is better than HW Raid. The FC RAID is limited
by the interface.
WRITE SW:140 ARC:371 IFT:352
For SW RAID 5 we needed to adjust the scheduling policy. By default we
got only 60 MB/s. SW RAID 0 write performance @64k is 522 MB/s.
Based on the performance numbers it looks like Linux SW RAID reads every
data element of a stripe + parity in parallel, performs xor operations
and than writes the data back to disk in parallel.
The HW Raid controllers seem to be a bit smarter in this regard. When
they encounter a large write with enough data for a full stripe they
seem to spare the read and perform only the xor + write in parallel.
Hence no seek is required and in can be closer to RAID0 write performance.
We have an application were large amounts of data need to be
sequentially written to disk (e.g. 100 MB at once). The storage system
has an USV so write caching can be utilized.
I would like to have an advice if write performance similar to HW Raid
controllers is possible with Linux or if there is something else that we
could apply.
Thanks in advance,
Mirko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
