Re: RAID6 Query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Colonel Hell wrote:

> I just went thru a couple of papers describing RAID6. 
> I dunno how relevant this discussion grp is for the qry ...but here I go :) ...
> I couldnt figure out why is P+Q configuration better over P+q' where
> q' == P. What I mean is instead of calculating a new checksum (thru a
> lot of GF theory etc) just store the parity block (P)again. In this
> case as well we have the same amount of fault tolerance or not
> :-s  ...   

this is no better than raid5 at surviving a two disk failure.  i.e. 
consider the case of two data blocks missing -- you can't reconstruct if 
all you have is parity.

-dean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux