Re: EVMS or md?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



H. Peter n wrote:
No hiccups, data losses, or missing functionality.  At the end of the
whole ordeal, the filesystem (1 TB, 50% full) was still quite prisine,
and fsck confirmed this.  I was quite pleased :)

I second this. I endured numerous kernel crashes and other lockup/forced restart issues while setting up a 15 drive 3TB raid-6 (Crashes not really realted to the mb subsystem except for the oddity in the -mm kernel, and that was not raid-6 specific). I have popped out various drives and caused numerous failures/rebuilds with an ext3 system over 90% full while burn in testing and not experienced one glitch.
It has been used in production now for over a month and is performing flawlessly. I have run it in full/1-disk and 2-disk degraded mode for testing. I certainly consider it stable.


Brad
--
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability
to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable
for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux