Re: RAID1 and data safety?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2005-03-29T13:26:32, "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Not good advice.  DO put the journal on a raid device.  It is much
> > safer there.
> Two journals means two possible sources of unequal information - plus the
> two datasets.  We have been through this before. You get the journal
> you deserve.

The RAID never exposes this potential inconsistency to the higher levels
though.

Indeed, you get what you deserve.


-- 
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux