Re: Good news / bad news - The joys of RAID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Siebenmann wrote:
You write:
| Thinking about what happened, I would have expected that the bad
| drive would just be removed from the array and spare activated and
| re-syncing started automatically.

 This is what is supposed to happen; when the hardware winds are blowing
in the right direction and the software recognizes everything, it even
really does happen.

Chris,

I suspect that what happened is that the array was in the process of re-syncing when I powered off the box because it had frozen because of an ATA timeout error.

When I re-booted, the RAID1 root partition was dirty and wouldn't re-sync while the RAID 5 array was re-syncing.

Whatever, I got it back up and running by disconnecting the failed drive.

Cheers,

R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux