Re: mdadm problems with partitioned md devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday November 23, c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2004@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [please CC: me]
> while trying to use md to overcome limitations of dm, I
> stumbled upon the following problem: It is impossible to
> have more than 4 partitioned md devices since mdadm will
> create the 5th device with major:minor 255:0, which is
> bogus.

You need user-space (libc in particular) that supports the new 32bit
device numbers in 2.6.  I don't know which version of glibc that would
be, or which distributions support it.  debian/unstable (which I use)
doesn't support it yet :-(

You could test your distribution with
   mknod /tmp/test b 253 1024
   ls -l /tmp/test
   rm /tmp/test

and see if the major/minor is reported as "253, 1024" or "253, 0".
If the later, you need new glibc.
If the former, your userspace is up-to-date but there must be a bug in
mdadm.
If this is the case, let me know and I will look into it.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux