RE: RAID5 - 2nd drive died whilst waiting for RMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Guy wrote:

> I learned years ago that Maxtor drives have a high failure rate.  I had
> hoped they improved over the years, I guess not.  My last Maxtor drive was
> 800 Meg.  Way overkill.  :)  Those were the days.
>
> Most of the time Maxtor drives have the best price.
> You get what you paid for.
>
> I like SeaGate myself.  But they have had some lemons.  But those were 1
> model.

Some of the Seagates are offering 5 year warrantys now too - that
certianly puts them head to head with one of the old reasons to get SCSI.
Eg:

http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=60962

This is £71.10 for 160GB/7200/8MB cache

The Maxtor equiv. is £63.86 with no warranty mentioned on that vendors
page. http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=147139

> Something to consider.  A bad block does not indicate a failed drive.
> However, this point is debatable.  There is a reason they have spare blocks.
> Most or all drives can re-locate a bad block to a spare.

PITA to deal with at the next level up though.

Gordon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux