Re: RAID5 crash and burn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Corey,

coreyfro@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Ahhhhhh... doesn't use the raidtab... nothing needs raidtab anymore... i
guess its time i got with the program...

About swap failing, would there be much of a performence hit if i mirrored
swap?


From what I read earlier in the thread, you already have a swap partition on software RAID5, so how would going to RAID1 hurt performance.?
With swap on RAID5 -- unless you are paging very heavily (enough for a full-stripe write) -- it seems you would go into Read-Modify-Write anyway and this will hurt ... badly.


Mirroring swap is a good idea to avoid crashes as Guy suggests.
If you are seriously considering the performance implications of RAID1 vs RAID5 for swap, you are already done for performance wise.


Personally I would not consider software RAID5 suitable for tasks which require performance. An exception would be for heavy I/O that causes full-stripe writes, in which case you would probably get a win out of the extra disks.

I hope this helps.

Kind Regards,

Nathan Dietsch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux