coreyfro@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
About swap failing, would there be much of a performence hit if i mirrored swap? I don't like running without it, and I don't want to repeat this incident... My system has more than enough ram for the load it has, but I under stand the other reasons for having swap, so slow swap is better than nothing or faulty, i spose...
What other reasons are these (genuine question - I'm curious)
I've got a box that is in a similar situation - loads of RAM, never anywhere near memory filling up. Currently I've not got swap activated but my disk architecture was created to allow one or two 1.5GB mirrored partitions for swap.
R. -- http://robinbowes.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
