Re: Stress testing system?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Robin Bowes wrote:

> This gave the following results:
>
> Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
>                      -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
> dude.robinbow 3096M 13081  95 34159  75 12617  21 15311  92 40429  30 436.1   3
> dude.robinbowes.com,3096M,13081,95,34159,75,12617,21,15311,92,40429,30,436.1,3,,,,,,,,,,,,,
>
> I don't actually know what the figures mean - is this fast??

It's not brilliant, but reasonable for a RAID5 on IDE drives. Disk head
bandwidth for comodity 7200 RPM drives is about 55MB/sec peak - although I
haven't been able to get that with the SATA controllers I've used so-far,
but I suspect thats because they are running in PATA mode.

This is a Dell with 4 SCSI drivers split over 2 controllers:

Version 1.02b       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
pixel         2000M 20492  72 54865  12 28260   6 25413  86 108190  13 332.9   0


This is a dual-Athlon with 5 IDE drives (4+hot spare)

Version 1.02b       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
red           1023M 14216  99 26663  25 17697  13 13767  95 72211  34 239.5   2

This is anothe dual athlon with just 4 IDE drives:

Version 1.02b       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
blue          1023M 12003  99 40147  44 24048  19 12078  98 87887  46 232.6   2

Your block input seems a shade low, but this is what I experienced on a
server with SATA drives which look like /dev/hdX drives. I suspect the
drivers have a bit more development to go through though.

And in any-case, depending on what you are using it for, it's probably
fast enough anyway... 100Mb Ethernet can only chuck files out at 10MB/sec
anyway, but it's always nice to have bandwidth in-hand!

Gordon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux