Re: libata badness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Great. I'll give that a shot after I drive checker utility finishes.

However it seems like the kernel shouldn't be oopsing, panicking, or double faulting if the drive is questionable. It apparently blew away my root fs last time. A peripheral drive failure shouldn't cause such destruction across the system, no?

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Mark Lord wrote:

I have used Maxtor "SATA" drives that require
the O/S to do a "SET FEATURES :: UDMA_MODE" command
on them before they will operate reliably.
This despite the SATA spec stating clearly that
such a command should/will have no effect.

I suppose libata does this already, but just in case not..
Something simple to check up on.
--
Mark Lord
(hdparm keeper & the original "Linux IDE Guy")

William Knop wrote:

Ah, well all of them are Maxtor drives... One 6y250m0 and three 7y250m0 drives. I'm using powermax on them right now. They all passed the quick test, and the full test results are forthcoming.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux