> > Hello.. > > > > I'm not sure if you are still developing the raid1 module for linux kernel , but I'll give a shot. > > > > Checking the source code of linux.2.6.8.1 , in raid1.c , at line 411 I found this: > > "Don't change to another disk for sequential reads" > > > > Well , my question is this: > > > > If there is a sequential read , but there are other disks in the array which are idle , isn't it a better way to read in chunks from all the disks ? I think the transfer rate will be much improved from reading from more disks , rather the using only one (altough is sequential read) > > > > > > Thanks > > Alex > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
