RE: megaraid megaraid2-2.10.7 causing kernel panic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The mailbox structure has the data transfer field "xferaddr" as well.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aleks Sheynkman [mailto:aleks@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 3:36 PM
> To: Mukker, Atul; linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: megaraid megaraid2-2.10.7 causing kernel panic
> 
> 
> I'm sorry for asking, but looking at ioctl structure I only 
> see single data field in both
> version. Is there are anyway you can explain about both fields ?
> 
> Thank you ,
> 
> Aleks
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mukker, Atul [mailto:Atulm@xxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:32 PM
> > To: Aleks Sheynkman; Mukker, Atul; linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: megaraid megaraid2-2.10.7 causing kernel panic
> > 
> > 
> > 1.18f reads the user address from the data field, but the new 
> > interface
> > packet has one data transfer field. So your best bet is to 
> > provide addresses
> > in both fields.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > -Atul
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Aleks Sheynkman [mailto:aleks@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 3:25 PM
> > > To: Mukker, Atul; linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> > > linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: megaraid megaraid2-2.10.7 causing kernel panic
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Isn't the same as was before in version megraid1.8f ?
> > > 
> > > Thanks !
> > > 
> > > Aleks
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mukker, Atul [mailto:Atulm@xxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:20 PM
> > > > To: Aleks Sheynkman; linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: megaraid megaraid2-2.10.7 causing kernel panic
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Aleks,
> > > > 
> > > > What you are using are undocumented interfaces to issue 
> > > > commands to the
> > > > driver. We do not provide support for these. But you 
> could easily
> > > > reverse-engineer the driver code to see what you are 
> > doing wrong :-)
> > > > 
> > > > This driver version expects the data transfer address to be 
> > > > available in the
> > > > FW packet transfer address field, which you are not 
> > > > providing. That mean the
> > > > HBA is doing DMA to a junk address causing the bizzare 
> > > > behaviors observed by
> > > > you.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > -Atul Mukker
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Aleks Sheynkman [mailto:aleks@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 1:06 PM
> > > > To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: megaraid megaraid2-2.10.7 causing kernel panic
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >   I'm really sorry to bother you ,and I hope this is a 
> > > > correct list to post
> > > > these kind of messages. I did post a similar message a day 
> > > ago. We are
> > > > currently experiencing problem with a new version of 
> > megaraid driver
> > > > (megaraid2-2.10.7). All our severs in the past were running 
> > > > RH 7.3 and now
> > > > we started migration process AS 2.1 specifically to update 
> > > > 2.4.9-e.49smp and
> > > > dkms megaraid version 2.10.7. After upgrade, all our systems 
> > > > were stable
> > > > until we started to run our hardware monitoring software. 
> > > > What it does, it
> > > > polls the status of all physical and logical driver through 
> > > > ioctl call.
> > > > Please see sample code below that would cause a kernel panic. 
> > > >  The code was
> > > > working just fine until version 1.8f version of megaraid 
> > > drivers, with
> > > > introduction of new driver it started to fail and cause 
> > > > kernel panics, which
> > > > kind of inconstant, sometimes it kills kernel swapper 
> > > > sometimes wait queues.
> > > > It seems like ioctl "M_RD_IOCTL_CMD " is totally broken, we 
> > > > can retrieve
> > > > correct number of adapters!
> > > >   by issuing ioctl suboption MEGAIOC_QNADAP.
> > > > 
> > > > Did any one ever seen this before, can you please advice ?
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you !
> > > > 
> > > > Code that will panic the kernel, run it few times:
> > > > 
> > > > #include "megaraid.h"
> > > > 
> > > > int main()
> > > > {
> > > >         int         fd;
> > > >        struct uioctl_t uioctl;
> > > > 
> > > >        if ( (fd = open("/dev/megadev0", O_RDWR)) < 0 && (fd =
> > > > open("/dev/megadev", O_RDWR)) < 0)
> > > >                 return -1;
> > > > 
> > > >         uioctl.inlen =  1024;
> > > >         uioctl.outlen = 1024;
> > > > 
> > > >         if(!(uioctl.data = malloc(1024))){
> > > >                 return 0;
> > > >         }
> > > >         memset(uioctl.data, 0, 1024);
> > > > 
> > > >         uioctl.ui.fcs.opcode     = M_RD_IOCTL_CMD;
> > > >         uioctl.ui.fcs.subopcode  = 0;
> > > >         uioctl.ui.fcs.adapno     = MKADAP(0);
> > > > 
> > > >         uioctl.mbox[0]           = FC_NEW_CONFIG;
> > > >         uioctl.mbox[2]           = NC_SUBOP_ENQUIRY3;
> > > >         uioctl.mbox[3]           = ENQ3_GET_SOLICITED_FULL;
> > > > 
> > > >         if(ioctl(fd, MEGAIOCCMD, &uioctl) == -1){
> > > >                 fprintf(stderr,"Error %d \n\n", 
> > > uioctl.ui.fcs.adapno);
> > > >                 fflush(stderr);
> > > >                 free(uioctl.data);
> > > >                 close(fd);
> > > >                 return 0;
> > > >         }
> > > > 
> > > >      close(fd);
> > > >  return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Panic:
> > > > 1) 
> > > > ug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: EIP is at iput_free 
> [kernel] 0x1e
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: eax: 2e0001e3   ebx: 
> > > f6880e40   ecx:
> > > > f6880e50   edx: f6880e50
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: esi: f6880e40   edi: 
> > > 00000000   ebp:
> > > > 0008e000   esp: f7383f60
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: Process kswapd (pid: 10,
> > > > stackpage=f7383000)
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: Stack: f587cb40 f5753b60 
> > > > c015a45c f587cb40
> > > > f393c3e0 f6880e40 00000006 c015a41b
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel:        f6880e40 f393c3f8 
> > > > f393c3e0 c015a806
> > > > f393c3e0 c02fa190 00000286 00000286
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel:        00000000 f7382000 
> > > > 00000000 00000000
> > > > 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: Call Trace: [dput+28/304] 
> > > > dput [kernel]
> > > > 0x1c (0xf7383f68)
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: Call Trace: [<c015a45c>] 
> > > > dput [kernel] 0x1c
> > > > (0xf7383f68)
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: [dentry_iput+75/112] 
> > > > dentry_iput [kernel]
> > > > 0x4b (0xf7383f7c)
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: [<c015a41b>] dentry_iput 
> > > > [kernel] 0x4b
> > > > (0xf7383f7c)
> > > > Aug 31 20:54:03 Analyzer kernel: [prune_dcache+182/336] 
> > prune_dcache
> > > > [kernel] 0xb6 (0xf7383f8c)
> > > >  
> > > > 2)p  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: Oops: 0000
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: Kernel 2.4.9-e.49smp
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: CPU:    1
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: EIP:    
> > > > 0010:[__wake_up+51/144]    Tainted:
> > > > P
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: EIP:    0010:[<c01198a3>]    
> > > > Tainted: P
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: EFLAGS: 00010046
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: EIP is at __wake_up 
> [kernel] 0x33
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: eax: f688800c   ebx: 
> > > f6888014   ecx:
> > > > 00000001   edx: 00000000
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: esi: 00000001   edi: 
> > > f4c8a880   ebp:
> > > > f4f25a94   esp: f4f25a7c
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: Process snmpd (pid: 626,
> > > > stackpage=f4f25000)
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: Stack: 00000000 00000282 
> > > > 00000001 f4c8a880
> > > > f4c7f040 00000000 f4ec28c0 c01daad9
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel:        00000002 00000026 
> > > > f4c7f178 00001060
> > > > 00007fff f4c7f178 c01ff422 f4c7f040
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel:        00000000 c01fe2f4 
> > > > f4c7f040 f4c7f178
> > > > ffffffff f4a8f0c0 3a6ade00 00000000
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: Call Trace: 
> > > > [sock_def_readable+57/112]
> > > > sock_def_readable [kernel] 0x39 (0xf4f25a98)
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: Call Trace: [<c01daad9>] 
> > > > sock_def_readable
> > > > [kernel] 0x39 (0xf4f25a98)
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: [tcp_data_queue+898/2688] 
> > > > tcp_data_queue
> > > > [kernel] 0x382 (0xf4f25ab4)
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: [<c01ff422>] tcp_data_queue 
> > > > [kernel] 0x382
> > > > (0xf4f25ab4)
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: [tcp_ack+180/784] tcp_ack 
> > > > [kernel] 0xb4
> > > > (0xf4f25ac0)
> > > > Sep  1 18:41:36 Analyzer kernel: [<c01fe2f4>] tcp_ack 
> > [kernel] 0xb4
> > > > (0xf4f25ac0)
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> > > > linux-scsi" in
> > > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > More majordomo info at  
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux