On Tuesday August 31, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Neil > copied you as I think there's a bug in resync behaviour (kernel.org 2.6.6) Yes, thanks. It's just a small bug. It only affect the content of /proc/mdstat and the "continuing on ... drives" message. Here is that patch which will be submitted shortly. Thanks again, NeilBrown ============================================= Correct "working_disk" counts for raid5 and raid6 This error only affects two message (and sysadmin heart-rate). It does not risk data. Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ### Diffstat output ./drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +- ./drivers/md/raid6main.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~ ./drivers/md/raid5.c --- ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~ 2004-08-30 14:43:27.000000000 +1000 +++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c 2004-09-01 10:17:19.000000000 +1000 @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rd if (!rdev->faulty) { mddev->sb_dirty = 1; - conf->working_disks--; if (rdev->in_sync) { + conf->working_disks--; mddev->degraded++; conf->failed_disks++; rdev->in_sync = 0; diff ./drivers/md/raid6main.c~current~ ./drivers/md/raid6main.c --- ./drivers/md/raid6main.c~current~ 2004-08-30 14:43:27.000000000 +1000 +++ ./drivers/md/raid6main.c 2004-09-01 10:17:46.000000000 +1000 @@ -498,8 +498,8 @@ static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rd if (!rdev->faulty) { mddev->sb_dirty = 1; - conf->working_disks--; if (rdev->in_sync) { + conf->working_disks--; mddev->degraded++; conf->failed_disks++; rdev->in_sync = 0; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html