Re: Call for RAID-6 users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I haven't seen any of those messages, so this is the first case
> happening.

I figured you were just busy, but wanted to see if anyone else could
guide my debugging before my boss made me give up and do RAID-5 :)
Thanks for the reply.

> Can you create failures by creating a full array and then fail out
> drives?  That would rule out problems with the way mdadm creates the
> array.

Yes, same problem.  If I create a full array with 6 devices, wait for
it to finish the synchronizing, then fail the first drive, I see the
same corruption.  See attached r6test-full.sh to demonstrate.

> My current guess based on what I've seen so far is that it's a bug
> in mdadm in creating arrays with exactly 1 missing drive, as opposed
> to a kernel bug.

FWIW, this does occur with an array created with 2 missing drives, as
well.

-jim

Attachment: r6test-full.sh
Description: Bourne shell script


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux