On 2003-11-14T16:30:42,
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> said:
> There are issues with the raid superblock but assuming they can be
> solved, I want partitioning to work easily.
>
> Can LVM work happily with 'legacy' partitioning information?
I'd really suggest to run DM (either LVM2 or EVMS2) on top of md
instead. It's much more flexible; I don't see any benefit in 'old style'
partition information, which has all sorts of problems - ie,
non-transactional updates (_why_ were you running raid again? ;), static
as they can't be modified during runtime etc.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
