Re: RAID1 VS RAID5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 03:45:19PM +0100, Mario Giammarco wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to buy new SCSI hard disk to be used with lsi 160
> controller in 32 bit pci.
> 
> I can choose:
> 
> - RAID5 of three Maxtor Atlas 10K II 9gb
> - RAID1 of two   Maxtro Atlas 10K III 18gb
> 
> My problem is: I have seen that RAID1 code does not interleave reads so
> it does not improve performance very much putting two hard disks.

 Performance boosting isn't primary goal in RAID schemes involving
 data replication.

 For RAID1 a suitably chosen read-interleave could be used to improve
 _large_ file reads, of course.  Another strategy is to distribute read
 operations to all online disks forming up the RAID1 set with elevators
 of their own.

> Is there a patch to change raid1 behaviour?

 If it feels important, such can be made.

> In linux 2.6.0 is it better?

 It can be made, if it isn't.

> Thanks in advance for any reply.
> -- 
> Mario Giammarco

/Matti Aarnio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux