On 2003-09-19T09:26:10,
Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> said:
> > A patch against 2.4-current is below. It probably works but I haven't
> > reviewed it in the context of other recent changes to md so I make no
> > promises.
> Thanks. I'll merge it against the current 2.4.
Hi Neil, turns out your patch did exactly what I did with lock_mddev(),
just with a bigger granularity (which I think is a good thing, but I was
too shy to introduce a new lock).
However, I can still reliably panic the kernel with the sequence I gave
on a SMP box, even though the panic now seems to occur in different
places...
So if you have any further idea what could cause that, I appreciate any
hints ;-)
I'll go dig in some deeper now and gear up kgdb...
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SuSE Labs try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG -- Samuel Beckett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
