>> Both arrays was created under some 2.2 kernel. Resync doesn't happen on >>2.5.25, too. >2.5.25 is ancient! That was typo. I was thinking about 2.2.25. Sorry. >2.6.0-test2 should be able to assemble it (it ignores those counts) >but there is some data corruption bug that I am hitting in >2.6.0-test2 that could well be raid5 related, so I'm not sure I >would recommend that. What about test3? >I could probably knock up a patch to 2.4.21 in a couple of days that >corrects the counts when an array is assembled. I'm very interested in this patch. I can wait few days and test it before I do proposed alternative method. >Alternatively if you can boot off a rescue disk, then > mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l5 -c 32 -n 3 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 missing > mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/sdc2 >should get you out of trouble. >NeilBrown -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz CS at FoE, Wroclaw University of Technology arekm@sse.pl AM2-6BONE, 1024/3DB19BBD, arekm(at)ircnet, PLD/Linux - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
