Re[2]: 3ware 7500 performance, was: experiences with 3Ware 6400 3W-6400?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Mikael,

Saturday, June 28, 2003, 4:42:58 PM, you wrote:
MA> Which is exactly what we all get in real-life file server environment when
MA> using onboard RAID5 without a lot of onboard cache (though I have seen the
MA> same behaviour even on SX6000 with 128 meg ram). Filesystem read is
MA> phenomenally fast (I have seen 150 meg+ off of 8 disk arrays) but write is 
MA> very slow (5-10 meg/s).  Sequential write is also fast, but that never 
MA> happens in a fileserver environment.
Exactly. One seriously looking for good random write performance should use
RAID10 - it's nearly as fast as RAID0 on 3ware. But that's another
story - it's not so cheap.

BTW re RAID performance i can recommend this excelent testing
http://www.fcenter.ru/articles.shtml?hdd/2216#4

He tested 3w7810 but I believe for random access 7810 and 7500-8 is
equivalent. It is in Russian, but all significant info (diagrams, charts) in
English.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alex                            mailto:alexver5@mail.ru

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux