RE: large devices (3ware) - thanx for the info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



With regards to your message at 03:16 PM 8/21/02, Rechenberg, Andrew. Where 
you stated:

>Just as an FYI on the PCI bus, we found out from some testing that a
>64-bit, 66MHz PCI bus can be the bottleneck while driving two LTO
>Ultrium tape devices, so the PCI bus could definitely be a bottleneck
>for fast hard disks (I don't know about ATA100/133 IDE, but with that
>many disks, probably).
>
>The next step up would be PCI-X which (I believe) is currently running
>at 133MHz and provides burst transfer rates at up to 1GB/s
>(GigaByte/sec) .
>
>Regards,
>Andy.

Problem is we are seeing WORSE figures on so-called fast PCI buses.
Both the Intel 7500 and Serverworks GC-LE actually give us WORSE figures on 
these same cards, which are 64 bit / 33MHz. Both boards have PCI-X slots, 
and we see no better in these slots.

And, from what I am seeing Intel 7500 has similar DMA issues in PCI as the 
old 860 chipset.



With our best regards,

Maurice W. Hilarius       Telephone: 01-780-456-9771
Hard Data Ltd.               FAX:       01-780-456-9772
11060 - 166 Avenue        mailto:maurice@harddata.com
Edmonton, AB, Canada      http://www.harddata.com/
    T5X 1Y3

2.3TB RAID5 NAS server - dual AthlonMP CPU, Linux, $10,995 CAD / $6850 USD

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux