> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Neil Brown > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 12:59 AM > To: cwebster@ec.rr.com > Cc: linux-raid > Subject: Re: Software RAID Stopped Working With Aurora Kernel > > > On Wednesday May 22, cwebster@ec.rr.com wrote: > > > > There were a few other minor inconsistencies that I thought you might be > > interested in between the output of "mdadm" and that of "lsraid" from > > the new raidtools. > > > > > > "mdadm --examine /dev/sda1" shows "State : dirty, no-errors". All other > > RAID drives show the same. > > > > "lsraid -D -a /dev/md0" shows "state = good". > All other RAID devices > > show the same. > > I have never looked at "lsraid". My guess is that "good" is > equivalent to "no-errors" and that lsraid doesn't bother to report > "dirty". This shouldn't relate to the filesystem superblock though... > still, a fsck every few months is a good idea. What made this observation noteworthy, however, was that it persisted even _after_ e2fsck was run on /dev/md0. --Cal Webster - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
