Re: data corruption - the nightmare continues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 06:18:36PM -0500, Justin wrote:
> FWIW i get the same thing ..
> 
> some of my raid1 arrays tend to become U_ after a few months
> of light use. Rebooting the box allows the device to be
> addressable again, and the disk is not, in fact, bad ..
> 
> I can do a complete dd to the "bad" disk without error, then
> raidhotadd it back in again as well. A few months later of
> uptime, it is U_ again..

Can you complete a dd *from* the bad disk ?

It's common to see bad blocks on a disk, the raid dropping the
disk, and then after a full dd to the disk everything is back
to normal.  This happens because the disk can re-allocate the
bad blocks during writes, whereas a read from a bad block
will fail.

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux