Re: two questions + a 1tb ide array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 05:50:30PM -0500, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:47:06PM +0100, Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> > ...
> > > If you use multiple partitions on the disks, the transfer time
> > > will significantly drop (because of massive seeking) - and this
> > > could explain why the cable failure doesn't show up - I guess.
> > 
> > s/transfer time/transfer rate/
> > 
> > --
> 
> This is a little puzzling. You'd expect problems with high
> transfer rates, not low, if it was a cable problem.

Yes.  (By "transfer rate" I mean bus utilization, not bus clock).

Utilizing the bus at 10% versus utilizing it at 100% would cause
fewer problems.  Doesn't that sound plausible ?

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux