Re: perfomance on IDE-Raid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:12:54PM -0800, Trent Piepho wrote:
> 
> I have no benchmarks for these controllers, but some for 3ware escalade IDE
> raid controllers.  From my research it seemed these were the best ones to get. 
> This might give you an idea of what to look for in performance.
> 
> Tyan TigerMP, AMD 760MP chipset, dual athlonXP 1800+
> 3-Ware Escalade 7410, Maxtor D540X 120GB drives (two and four drives)
> Kernel 2.4.16, 99GB ext2 filesytem
> 
>               -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
>               -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> Machine    MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU  /sec %CPU
> RAID0 2d 1500 20767 99.0 38409 16.9 17173  9.7 17810 84.5  71408 25.5 327.9  1.9
> RAID0 4d 1500 20863 99.5 75553 34.5 17293 10.2 19161 91.8 102605 39.9 503.8  2.4
> RAID5 4d 1500  5989 28.4  5602  2.2  3883  2.0 11864 56.8  85523 34.2 436.2  1.6
> 
> 
> Supermicro 370DE6, ServerWorks HE-sl chipset, dual PIII 1000
> 3-Ware Escalade 7850, Maxtor D540X 120GB drives (four drives)
> Kernel 2.2.20, 99GB ext2 filesystem
> 
>               -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
>               -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> Machine    MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU  /sec %CPU
> RAID0 4d 1300 19981 99.6 78259 43.5 25303 33.4 18295 88.9 141316 80.5 787.4  4.5
> RAID5 4d 1300 19892 99.1 26533 12.2  6856  8.8 15146 73.3  92960 49.0 785.9  2.9
> 
> 
> Hopefully I will be able to add more drives to the 7850 controller, which can
> hold up to 8, and see if that increases RAID5 performance.  However, even the
> current hardware raid5 is much faster than a Mylex Extremeraid 3000, which is
> a much more expensive card (about $1600 vs $650) and uses much much more
> expensive SCSI drives ($8.20/GB vs $1.66/GB).  I didn't save the E3000
> benchmarks, but it was about 20MB/sec write and 50MB/sec read I think.

Wow, those numbers look great!  Any idea why the PIII system seems to be a
bit faster than the XP system, especially with random seeks?  How much
memory does each machine have?  Do you happen to remember how many random
seeks/s the SCSI system was able to sustain?

I'm forwarding these numbers to my sysadmin in order to convince him to pick
up some of these cards to play with.  ;-)

-Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux