On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, at 10:28 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: [...] > Once we've set up the procedures for maintaining the flatpak ourselves, > is there any reason to have a separate repository for it? Shouldn't the > flatpak stuff go to the main pavucontrol repo? Not that I have anything > against having push rights to the current github repo for now. (By "the > procedures" I mean documenting how to update the flatpak build files > and how to test them, and following that documentation when doing > releases.) I think it might be worth having it on flathub to be able to use all the existing CI infrastructure over there. Cheers, Arun _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
