Hi, On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz > <luiz.dentz at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz at intel.com> >> >> Since there is no longer support for BlueZ 4 it makes no sense to keep >> BlueZ 5 modules separated. >> > > AFAICT, this would render invalid many configuration files as they would > refer to module-bluez5-*. Is this desirable? You mean there are some configuration that still needs changing or you are referring to the fact that default.pa should be updated? I suppose the latter happens all the time when there is a new module, but perhaps we want some alias so distros don't have the trouble of changing bluez to bluetooth. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz
