On 02/21/2018 09:41 PM, Raman Shuishniou wrote: > 21.02.2018 20:07, Georg Chini пиÑ?еÑ?: >> Maybe you misunderstood me. What I mean, is that the pipe can be >> opened for writing as long as we are suspended. So it open when >> we see that the source is suspended or when we auto suspend. Close >> it as soon as the source gets unsuspended. This will avoid POLLHUP >> during suspend completely. While auto suspended, we additionally have >> to listen for POLLIN. >> This way we can only get POLLHUP (or POLLIN with no data) when the >> source is running. >> > > I think I understand. We need to keep our writer opened while transition > from autosuspended to opened state and just set events = 0. > > But what I don't understand - why you so hate the freeing and allocating > rtpoll_item during this transition? > > I'll try ro rewrite the patch (again) while we waiting for Tanu to apply > his patches. > Also, did I still need to make this behaviour optional? -- Raman
