On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 17:02 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> None of the callers checks the return value anyway. Return the offset only
> if message processing fails. This is in preparation for the next patch.
> ---
> src/pulsecore/sink.c | 3 +--
> src/pulsecore/source.c | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/pulsecore/sink.c b/src/pulsecore/sink.c
> index 39689437..a6a3a2fb 100644
> --- a/src/pulsecore/sink.c
> +++ b/src/pulsecore/sink.c
> @@ -1549,8 +1549,7 @@ pa_usec_t pa_sink_get_latency_within_thread(pa_sink *s) {
>
> /* FIXME: We probably should make this a proper vtable callback instead of going through process_msg() */
>
> - if (o->process_msg(o, PA_SINK_MESSAGE_GET_LATENCY, &usec, 0, NULL) < 0)
> - return -1;
> + o->process_msg(o, PA_SINK_MESSAGE_GET_LATENCY, &usec, 0, NULL);
>
> /* usec is unsigned, so check that the offset can be added to usec without
> * underflowing. */
> diff --git a/src/pulsecore/source.c b/src/pulsecore/source.c
> index 14250825..12aa19d1 100644
> --- a/src/pulsecore/source.c
> +++ b/src/pulsecore/source.c
> @@ -1144,8 +1144,7 @@ pa_usec_t pa_source_get_latency_within_thread(pa_source *s) {
>
> /* FIXME: We probably should make this a proper vtable callback instead of going through process_msg() */
>
> - if (o->process_msg(o, PA_SOURCE_MESSAGE_GET_LATENCY, &usec, 0, NULL) < 0)
> - return -1;
> + o->process_msg(o, PA_SOURCE_MESSAGE_GET_LATENCY, &usec, 0, NULL);
>
> /* usec is unsigned, so check that the offset can be added to usec without
> * underflowing. */
Looks good to me.
--
Tanu
https://www.patreon.com/tanuk
