On 14.04.2017 17:26, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > With the recent patches, we seem to be standardising on "sink_master" > and "source_master" as the modarg names for specifying the master > device. To me "master_sink" and "master_source" would look better, > however. I won't explain why, because if my preferred modarg naming > scheme isn't obviously better, there's little point in changing the > naming. So, should I write a patch or not? > To me, master_sink and master_source also sound better.
