On 14.04.2017 14:38, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 22:43 +0200, Georg Chini wrote: >> + case LOOPBACK_MESSAGE_UNDERRUN: >> + >> + u->underrun_counter++; > I'd still like to have a log message about the counter increment, even > though it's possible to deduce the value from other log messages. > > Otherwise looks good to me. > Thanks, added a log message and pushed both patches.