On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 17:49 -0500, Hajime Fujita wrote: > So now I have a new set of patches which (hopefully) address all of > Anton's following comments. > Now the patches are rebased against `next`, as some of the raop > patches have already been merged here. > > I think the standard practice is to rebase patches on top of master, > but for this case can I simply push the patches on top of next? Yes, basing the patches on "next" is probably the best choice. -- Tanu https://www.patreon.com/tanuk
