On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 19:21 +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:09:54PM +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > This reverts commit 74251f07864c63439ea847d7287024ac54578d64. > > > > The reverted commit was not intended to make any behavioral changes, but > > it broke at least the case where a client writes more data than the > > server has requested. > > > > BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99211 > > --- > > ACK Thanks, I pushed this now. I noticed that memblockq-test started failing, though. As far as I can see, it's a bug in the test. Fixing it isn't complicated as such, but I want to add some additional comments to the test, and also remove pa_memblockq_missing() because that function is only used in memblockq-test and its definition of "missing" is different from pa_memblockq_pop_missing(). I'll send patches tomorrow (or maybe today, but probably tomorrow). -- Tanu https://www.patreon.com/tanuk
