Thanks for the pointers! I like your proposal at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62588#c6. Do you know what is needed in order to make progress on some sort of solution? Is more consensus needed? Or work on code? Something else? On 12/14/2016 08:57 AM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Hello David, > > there was some discussion on this topic in these existing bugs: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62588 > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94563 > > > 2016-12-14 5:23 GMT+05:00 David Mandelberg <david at mandelberg.org>: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to have a way to downmix sources that have more channels than >> my sink, but never upmix sources with fewer channels. So I was thinking >> of writing a patch to add "upmix" and "downmix" as valid values to the >> enable-remixing option. Is that a good idea? (Also, apologies if this >> has been discussed before. I did some searching and did not find >> anything relevant.) >> >> -- >> David Eric Mandelberg / dseomn >> http://david.mandelberg.org/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pulseaudio-discuss mailing list >> pulseaudio-discuss at lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss >> > > > -- David Eric Mandelberg / dseomn http://david.mandelberg.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20161215/633d8663/attachment.sig>
