On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 15:19 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 15:03 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Â static const char* const valid_modargs[] = {
> > Â Â Â Â Â "path",
> > +Â Â Â Â "disable_profile_hfp",
>
> We try to avoid negative option names on the basis that double
> negatives are not nice ("disable_foo=no"), so I'd prefer
> "enable_profile_hfp".
Hmm, maybe that's not a good name, if the option only affects HFP HF
support, and not HFP AG. Would "enable_profile_hfp_hf" work? It's
pretty awful from user-friendliness perspective, but I have trouble
coming up with better names.
--Â
Tanu
