25.02.2015 07:25, Arun Raghavan wrote: > The falce branch would only be called when recv_counter > > send_counter, so you'd never actually have the zero case. AIUI, this > all just accounting for any "in-flight" rewinds being propagated from > the sink-input to the source-output. OK, this busts the continuity argument, but, as you essentially repeat it below, let's start from that instead. > Also, overwriting the value as you do loses the latency values that > were added in previous lines. No! Look at the first argument of PA_CLIP_SUB. Before the patch, the contribution from the previous lines was double-counted, unless I am missing something. -- Alexander E. Patrakov
