should prebuf always be greater than minreq ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 09 octobre 2014 ? 18:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan a ?crit :
> Strong nack for fixing without figuring it out. Can we have a bug
> report please?
> 
> -- Arun

Agreed about not applying a patch/fix (none were send and I made it
explicit I had only a workaround).

All I ask is information to know if there might be a bug in pulseaudio.

I asked if minreq should be <= prebuf , as the only proportion between
those two I found was to init "prebuf = tlength" and "minreq=tlength/5".
This 1 to 5 proportion I found in "PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC" code.

And the documentation tell about minreq "will initialize this to a value
that is deemed sensible by the server". 


In short I look for what would be "deemed sensible by the server".

Should I send a bug report about that or is the ML more appropriate a
field ?

Best,
Alban




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux