2014-11-26 13:51 GMT+01:00 Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com>: > On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 12:39 +0100, Ondrej Holecek wrote: >> 2014-11-26 11:19 GMT+01:00 Peter Meerwald <pmeerw at pmeerw.net>: >> > >> >> FSF address used in PA sources are no longer valid ones and rpmlint >> >> generates numerous warnings during packaging because of this. >> >> This patch changes all FSF addresses to valid one according to FSF web >> >> page. >> > >> > I'd prefer removing the address paragraph entirely >> >> I have no problem with that, but is it legal? Doesn't GPL mandate some >> header like that? > > FSF actually nowadays prefers[1] a URL instead of a postal address: "You > should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with > this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>." > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html Yes, my bad. Assumptions before reading :) Anyway, I have prepared new patch. I will post it shortly. Thanks for help. > > -- > Tanu >
