On Wednesday 26 November 2014 12:39:38 Ondrej Holecek wrote: > 2014-11-26 11:19 GMT+01:00 Peter Meerwald <pmeerw at pmeerw.net>: > >> FSF address used in PA sources are no longer valid ones and > >> rpmlint generates numerous warnings during packaging > >> because of this. This patch changes all FSF addresses to > >> valid one according to FSF web page. > > > > I'd prefer removing the address paragraph entirely > > I have no problem with that, but is it legal? Doesn't GPL > mandate some header like that? Which part of GPL licence do you think is forcing you to do that? I think that in GPL terms and conditions the is no one. In section "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs" (which is not part of GPL terms and conditions) is written that each file should (not have to!) have at least copyright line and a pointer to where the full notice. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20141126/3e38001e/attachment.sig>
