On 2014-11-16 23:15, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> In case all other ports went to availability no, a port going to unknown
> can actually be the best available port so check in that case as well.
> Specifically this happens when various jacks get unplugged and speakers
> are left as the available port (unknown availability) *and* the speakers
> did the no -> unknown transition after all others transitions to no.
Hmm, this requires some careful thought. Like, in the case there is more
than one port that is "unknown", and the user selects that port
manually, then another port goes from no (or yes!) to unknown, that port
might be selected, or not selected, based on port priority or something...?
I think we need to restrict this one to "only consider unknown ports in
case *all* other ports are unavailable"? Does that make sense?
> ---
> src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c b/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c
> index 7397bcc..5f97292 100644
> --- a/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c
> +++ b/src/modules/module-switch-on-port-available.c
> @@ -143,9 +143,6 @@ static pa_hook_result_t port_available_hook_callback(pa_core *c, pa_device_port
> pa_source *source;
> bool is_active_profile, is_active_port;
>
> - if (port->available == PA_AVAILABLE_UNKNOWN)
> - return PA_HOOK_OK;
> -
> card = port->card;
>
> if (!card) {
> @@ -184,10 +181,9 @@ static pa_hook_result_t port_available_hook_callback(pa_core *c, pa_device_port
> pa_source_set_port(source, port->name, false);
> if (sink)
> pa_sink_set_port(sink, port->name, false);
> - }
> -
> - if (port->available == PA_AVAILABLE_NO) {
> + } else {
> if (sink) {
> +
> pa_device_port *p2 = pa_device_port_find_best(sink->ports);
>
> if (p2 && p2->available != PA_AVAILABLE_NO)
>
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
